The biggest difference between the 17-40 and the similar-focal-length-covering 16-35 L is price. The 17-40 is much less expensive - practically half the price. But of course, the 16-35 is able to let in twice as much light. See the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review for a comparison to the newer 16-35 L Lens version.
[NEAR MINT] Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 f2.8 L II USM Lens From JAPAN $559.99 Trending at $569.99 eBay determines this price through a machine learned model of the product's sale prices within the last 90 days.
I have been looking at lenses - This lens does not have Image stablization. The Picures I have taken so far are pretty good. But seeing other lenses RF have IS. I see other lenses with f/4.has IS. My question is the lens being f/2.8 not need IS becasue it is a faster lens when compared to the
The Canon EF 16-35mm f/4 L IS USM is one of the finest wide-angle lenses Canon has produced. Used Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II USM. which can easily beat the Canon workhorse 16-35/2.8. I am
Focal Length/Aperture 16 – 35 mm f/2.8 Lens Construction 12 groups, 16 elements Minimum Aperture f/22 Angle of View Diagonal: 108° 10’ – 63° Vertical: 74° 10’ – 38° Horizontal: 98° – 54° Min. Focusing Distance 0.28 m / 0.9 ft. Max. Magnification and 0.22× (at 35 mm),
.